that change by having the various Attorneys General file a Federal Injunction prohibiting the payment of any Federal Funds to any Sanctuary City or any State that refuses to enforce the laws of the land? For example: The Basic Pilot Program that requires employers to check new hires identifications to ensure that they are authorized to work in the USA. The State of Illinois — Barack Obama’s corrupt state has passed a law prohibiting employers from checking employee’s identification even though it’s Federal Law. Also, Chicago is a Sanctuary City that allows churches to harbor illegal immigrants. New York is a Sanctuary City — that’s where Hillary is from and if they wouldn’t protect the citizens of the USA from all these illegal immigrants and employers who are committing crimes by hiring and harboring them, how could we even remotely expect them to uphold the Constitution?

Immigration issue is already off the table.
All three candidates still alive are in full agreement on immigration.
All of them support solving the problem by simply renaming illegal immigrants to legal immigrants.

CHICAGO (Aug. 17) — A federal jury found former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich guilty on Tuesday of one count of lying to federal agents, and the judge said he intended to declare a mistrial on the more serious remaining 23 counts.

U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald says the government is getting ready for a retrial of Blagojevich and his co-defendant brother as soon as possible. The charges had included the accusation that they had tried to sell or trade President Barack Obama’s old Senate seat and that the governor had tried to use the power of his office for personal gain.

Blagojevich said. "They could not prove I did anything wrong – except for one nebulous charge from five years ago."

http://www.aolnews.com/nation/article/rod-blagojevich-corruption-trial-judge-has-received-verdict-in-blagojevich-case/19597594?icid=main|main|dl1|link1|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aolnews.com%2Fnation%2Farticle%2Frod-blagojevich-corruption-trial-judge-has-received-verdict-in-blagojevich-case%2F19597594

It’s f’ing golden! It sounds like to me the jury had one nut job in the jury room with them that wouldn’t play ball.

Is it legally ethical to force a fellow into confinement of any kind, especially as one ‘deemed insane’ by civil finding prior to a legal diagnosis, wherein there is no public presence at the hearing and no jury, or meaning-full appeal practice, and then bill his estate to pay for it? Or is it the ethical standard that a judge can with no "worth" of his / her own can simply order the institutions that wish to stay open under his / her watch do his or her bidding and without any of the protections of the jury system jail in a farcical institution with doors more securely locked than many prisons warehouse all of his political opponents or those of differing race, ethnicity, religions and or etc. likely to vote against him until such time as the imprisoned are so dope dependent they will not likely vote against him / her, whilst telling the rest of the country that the so jailed are to pay for their own incarceration? Or is it legally ethical standard for any court to deem the mentally ill "found" can be asked to loose assets in the hundreds of thousands of dollars and thus go into debt, and thus be both stigmatized, humiliated and face federal or extra state extradition to face charges with real and unavoidable jail time for non-payment of debts that would have been covered by forfeit assets, formerly held, but lost due to such confinement, whereas the States have no protocol that protects the assets of renters at all over a barely minimal amount?

I’m specifically speaking of an individual arrested as he was in the process of physically leaving his home, that was being "closed" by the landlord. Thus all of his assets were in the form of hard assets, transportable by a single fellow traveling on a bicycle and thus easily stolen away while he was confined.

I’m reminding the answering public that most banks deal with those in control of a 5.11 trillion dollar illicit drug trade, and a 5.11 trillion dollar illicit sex trade, knowingly or not at upper management levels. But certainly most of those laundering money from this illicit at least believe they have "pull" at some level in said banks; they believe they can control the actions of such banks or would not leave money there. Thus the more honest people do not leave money there, as it only serves to aid dishonest folk hide illicit gains.

These figures are extrapolations of Carter era FBI estimates, the last President we’ve had I’d trust walk my dog, with the sole exception perhaps of President Obama, as I don’t know enough about him one way or another but trust him anyway.

The police simply do not secure ones assets, when they confine one. Period. Even or especially when they know you’ve gathered the resources to pay off debts and are traveling to the States that lent your ex money to pay them off, and would then be able to hire attorneys to fight for some degree of civil rights.

Instead they do the best they can not to shoot one outright. Given the pressures the mobs can place on the finger triggers.

Yes, they sometimes fail at this ~ this person has been shot at least three times by the police, four if you count the informant the police let while listening into the wire forcibly participate in a rape against and then shoot ~ but hey, they do try, I guess, especially given this had been a cop himself, once or three times.

But for now, lets only concern ourselves with the ethics of property loss in "mental illness" "observation situations". Where the fellow has committed no crime, but is assumed perhaps with little to no reason other than more than one person’s say so, that he’s "nuts". Cause, I guess, more people from away are crazy than robbed ~ and nobody robs by date rape drug and call to the police to force confinement whilst the victim’s estate is taken.

Most states allow for brief (perhaps 72 hour) confinement upon an allegation before a magistrate or the local community services board that someone is a danger to themselves or others. Generally there is a hearing with a court-appointed attorney pretty quickly. The exact procedures vary from state-to-state.

My ex got a court order to get temporary full custody/possession of our daughter on June 29, 2009. I missed four court dates for custody hearings but never knew of them and that is the reasoning behind this. I’m trying to use the cook county services available but I really need a probono lawyer to help me with this. I miss here so much! My ex won’t even let me see her either.

How the heck did you not know about four different court dates? You need to be more responsible because first of all, it’s a court date, and second of all, this court date deals with your child!! But, you need to go talk to someone in Legal Aid, but it’s very unlikely you’ll find a probono lawyer, that’s what court-appointed lawyers are for.