AEI Event: Should Israel Attack Iran? October 23, 2009 http://www.aei.org/event/100155
Iran’s nuclear weapons development continues apace, threatening the security of its neighbors and the international community. According to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center, more than 60 percent of the American public believes preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons warrants military action. Israel’s deputy foreign minister, Daniel Ayalon, emphasized on September 21 that Israel has not taken any option off the table when it comes to countering the Iranian threat. The same day, Israel’s top general, chief of staff Lieutenant General Gabi Ashkenazi, made it clear that he would not rule out a military strike on Iran’s nuclear installations, repeating that “Israel has the right to defend itself and all options are on the table.” As the debate intensifies over how to respond most effectively to Iran’s provocations, it is timely to explore the strategic and legal parameters of a potential Israeli strike against the Islamic Republic and provide some thorough analysis about implications for the United States.
The speakers in Panel I considered the international legal aspects of an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear installations. What treaties are relevant? How might Iran retaliate against Israel, the United States, or other countries? Would an Israeli attack violate international law? Or would it be legitimate self-defense? Eric Posner of the University of Chicago Law School, Gregory E. Maggs of George Washington University Law School, and Edwin D. Williamson of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP discussed these and other legal considerations. AEI visiting scholar John Yoo moderated.
Duration : 0:7:51
[youtube -Sua9PcitfY]
Tags: AEI, Edwin D. Williamson, Eric Posner, Gregory E. Maggs, International Law, Iran, Israel, John Yoo, nuclear weapons, Should Israel Attack Iran, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, University of Chicago
